Based on the first 40 minutes of the film and Chapters 1–11 of the book, does the visual version of Chris’s journey make his choices seem more justified or more reckless than the text does? Explain how the medium (film vs writing) shapes your perspective. image.png
The film uses beautiful scenery and a sad soundtrack to make his trip feel like a meaningful quest for freedom. Seeing his parents fight on screen gives a clear reason for why he had to leave home to protect his mental health. However, the book feels more like a police report. It uses facts to show how unprepared Chris really was since he didn't even have a map. This makes his choices seem less like a cool adventure and more like a dangerous mistake.
Today we watched the film "Into The Wild" based on the book.
Today I learned the difference between the film and the book
Comments
Post a Comment